Why did we say it was? At a press conference yesterday, Rick Bergman said that the 900 series chipsets, were shipping later this month, and Bulldozer, the CPU that is meant to go with it, ships about a month later. That means June for 9xx chipsets, July for Bulldozer. The problem is that the desktop variant, originally, due in late June or early July, was delayed the two months we said it was. The server variant however is pulled in to about where the desktop was. Those of you keen on roadmaps will realize that the server chip was previously set to come out at the end of the August, where the desktop is now planed for.
If this looks like AMD did not actually delay anything, just flipped them around, that is about it. Performance didn’t seem to be a sore point when we asked some people who would know, but that isn’t confirmation either way. No word on what the release stepping is either. Take home message, desktop and server variant release time are flipped, the rest is wait and see. We’re waiting……..S|A
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- ST brings Java, widgets, and code generation to the STM32 line - Dec 11, 2013
- LSI shows off 28nm 28Gbps SerDes for 32Gb FC and 100GbE - Dec 10, 2013
- LSI extends Syncro to four nodes and beyond - Dec 10, 2013
- Tablet OSes killed Windows 8 and Microsoft with it - Dec 9, 2013
- ARM makes a learning remote that will never need batteries - Dec 5, 2013