SemiAccurate Forums  

 
Go Back   SemiAccurate Forums > Main Category > CPUs

CPUs Talk about processors and related technology

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-2011, 06:33 PM
Rofas Rofas is offline
8-bit overflow
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 316
Rofas is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Bulldozer Preview - faked results (warning)

Donanimhaber published a new Preview based on FX-8130P B1.







Source with Benchmarks: http://www.donanimhaber.com/islemci/...-sonuclari.htm
  #2  
Old 07-08-2011, 06:44 PM
PhotonPass PhotonPass is offline
itanic
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 92
PhotonPass is on a distinguished road
Default

Hmm, aren't these scores still almost needless because these are off ESs and not the final retail product? Or am I totally wrong in saying that?

Last edited by PhotonPass; 07-08-2011 at 06:44 PM. Reason: typo
  #3  
Old 07-08-2011, 06:49 PM
Rofas Rofas is offline
8-bit overflow
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 316
Rofas is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotonPass View Post
Hmm, aren't these scores still almost needless because these are off ESs and not the final retail product? Or am I totally wrong in saying that?

Maybe, maybe not. It's only a Preview. Not to forget that Bulldozer is coming with FX8150 instead FX8130P.
  #4  
Old 07-08-2011, 07:07 PM
muziqaz muziqaz is offline
640k who needs more?
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 833
muziqaz is on a distinguished road
Default

Here is my post from xs regarding this 'preview':

Quote:
Memory subsystem is all over the place. Look at the latency of L2. double of that of my thuban.

And superpi again
At least it is kicking my thuban @3.9ghz by 3k points in cinebench 10
and loosing in PC mark to my 3.9ghz thuban by 100points
and about the same as 4ghz thuban at chess benchmark
and wins by 2fps in physics score on 3dmark11
  #5  
Old 07-08-2011, 07:08 PM
PorscheRacer14's Avatar
PorscheRacer14 PorscheRacer14 is offline
2^10
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,459
PorscheRacer14 will become famous soon enough
Default

Well the memory scores on the mainboard memory, and L3 cache are good (as compared to my slightly OC'd 1055T) but the L1 and L2 cache are garbage.... That also could be why it needed a fix. Could be the SRAM structures needed a respin to get the performance up. Other than that, not much to see here.

Last edited by PorscheRacer14; 07-08-2011 at 07:10 PM.
  #6  
Old 07-08-2011, 07:22 PM
muziqaz muziqaz is offline
640k who needs more?
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 833
muziqaz is on a distinguished road
Default

3.6ghz 2600K gets 7100points in physics 3dmark 11.
  #7  
Old 07-08-2011, 07:37 PM
Evildead666's Avatar
Evildead666 Evildead666 is offline
8-bit overflow
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yvelines, France
Posts: 605
Evildead666 is on a distinguished road
Default

The CPU-Z shot has 3.2GHz, and the AIDA64 has 4.2GHz.

That's a 1GHz Turbo.

One of the slides we saw a while back had something looking like the highest end FX processor would get 1GHz Turbo Boost.
__________________
HP6735s, 2x2Gb, BDR, Intel SSD.
Nook tablet - Cyanogenmod 7 32Gb SDcard
  #8  
Old 07-08-2011, 09:07 PM
MTd2 MTd2 is offline
2^10
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,818
MTd2 is on a distinguished road
Default

Bad news for you people. These benchmarks are probably fake:

"CPUz doesn't support BD in version 1.57.1 only in 1.58. So these so called BD benchmarks are probably fake."

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post4900374
  #9  
Old 07-08-2011, 10:41 PM
PhotonPass PhotonPass is offline
itanic
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 92
PhotonPass is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTd2 View Post
Bad news for you people. These benchmarks are probably fake:

"CPUz doesn't support BD in version 1.57.1 only in 1.58. So these so called BD benchmarks are probably fake."

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post4900374
Mmm, I am inclined to agree. Many of the benches that I have seen to me, are fakes and/or irrelevant (but fun to speculate about) because they can be 'shopped or that they are from ES's; neither of which represent the final retail boxed version of the product.

AMD, once again, are really masters at clamping down on information. We've seen it before with Northern Islands, we're seeing it now with Bulldozer, and when may most likely see it again next go around. I think someone mentioned that AMD should get some sort of reward or something for their secrecy.

PS: I kinda see AMD with the Internet's Troll Face, not in a negative light though. xD
  #10  
Old 07-09-2011, 12:57 AM
inf64 inf64 is offline
640k who needs more?
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 855
inf64 is on a distinguished road
Default

Benchmarks are real,performance is fake . Pcmark 7 score is dead giveaway,something is borked in the bios or chip itself.It is scoring 3000pts while Llano 3850 gets 3340pts running at 2.9Ghz and no Turbo <=This is not going to happen.

edit: not to mention the dreaded super pi 1M score is 19+s while the amd-hater guy posted the score of 14.5s on his blog long time ago(3.2Ghz +Turbo). That is 31% difference in result.
__________________
Latest blog

Last edited by inf64; 07-09-2011 at 01:00 AM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SemiAccurate is a division of Stone Arch Networking Services, Inc. Copyright 2009 Stone Arch Networking Services, Inc, all rights reserved.