SUPERTALENT LAUNCHED THEIR new USB3 Express drive with an added DRAM cache last week. The real question is whether or not the DRAM caches added any real performance or it is just a marketing ploy.
If you recall, the Express was the first ‘cheap’ USB3 memory stick out there, something that was sorely needed in the market. The new one adds a 32MB of DRAM as a cache on the stick, hopefully addressing one of the weakest points of flash drives. From there, you have to ask, if it actually does anything in the real world, or is it just there for show?
Note the bottom left and right
If you look at the sequential speeds, the older non-cached drive is about 10% faster, but that isn’t the end of the world. On 512K blocks, the older drive is again a bit faster to read, but writes are about 1/20th the speed of the cached drive. That is what I wold call a performance advantage.
If that isn’t enough for you, on 4K blocks, the cached drive is about 10% faster when reading but 100x faster for writes. Yes, that is not a misprint, it is 100 times as fast. It looks like that cache is actually worthwhile after all.S|A
Charlie Demerjian
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- More on Intel’s 10nm process problems - Sep 17, 2018
- Intel puts out another 14nm 2020 server platform - Sep 11, 2018
- Why Can’t Intel Supply Enough 14nm Xeons? - Sep 10, 2018
- Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE directly recommends AMD Epyc - Sep 7, 2018
- AMD reintroduces the Athlon name with two CPUs - Sep 6, 2018
