A year after SemiAccurate first told you about Matterport, they are back at GDC with heavily revised production hardware. What was an impressive way to do 3D scanning back then is now a salable, productized, good idea.
The idea is simple enough, take a very high rez 3D scanner, put it on a tripod, and spin it around to capture a 360 degree view of its surroundings. Add in some software to stitch it all together seamlessly, slap that on a server somewhere, and have it spit out a nice 3D image complete with the underlying mesh. It isn’t just pretty pictures, it is geometry too.
Matterport scanners, now with added handle!
The new Matterport scanner is much better than the old, at least better functioning. The old one looked like a nice white blob, kind of high-tech while the new one looks like medically functional footwear. OK, it isn’t that bad but it does lack elegance compared to the prototype, something more than made up for by the features, plus it has a handle.
As the keener eyed among you might have noticed, the new scanner has three cameras compared to the older version’s two. Each row has an RGB camera and a depth scanner so it will grab three sets of pixels with geometry at the same time. More importantly the software now stops the scan in six spots to take full HDR photos for stitching into the mesh later. With Version 1.0 you not only get mm level accuracy of scans, you get HDR pixels stuck to them.
Update March 26 2014 @ 3:30pm: Matterport is clarifying their numbers, they say that meshes are only accurate to an inch not millimeters. Also they only claim about 30 minutes for processing, not 15 as we said in the last article. Basically they are being conservative on what they promise, and that is usually a good thing from a company.
In short this new version is smaller, faster, more accurate, has better color fidelity, matches your army issued glasses, and has a 10 hour battery. It also doesn’t need external Wi-Fi now, it can store more and do more on its own, but still needs an iPad for uploading and handling data. About the only down side is that the new release costs $4500, more than the $3000 the original was aiming at. On the bright side, it is still $1500 per camera set, HDR is thrown in for free if you buy more than two.
Once you are done scanning the Matterport ‘cloud’ software will suck in your image and stitch it all together correctly. It costs $19/scan with up to 100 passes in an area considered one location, amazingly cheap compared to doing a subset of that manually. In short you can do a fair-sized building for one $19 fee and it will come back as a single coherent data set. Compared to anything else on the market, Matterport’s solution seems better in almost every way. I want one.S|A
Have you signed up for our newsletter yet?
Did you know that you can access all our past subscription-only articles with a simple Student Membership for 100 USD per year? If you want in-depth analysis and exclusive exclusives, we don’t make the news, we just report it so there is no guarantee when exclusives are added to the Professional level but that’s where you’ll find the deep dive analysis.
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- Intel’s benchmarking antics questioned - Dec 10, 2019
- Qualcomm talks about Snapdragon 765 and 865 modules - Dec 9, 2019
- What is Intel going to be showing at CES 2020? - Dec 9, 2019
- Qualcomm outs the Snapdragon 765 and 865 - Dec 3, 2019
- Chris Hook and Heather Lennon leave Intel - Nov 27, 2019