Gigabyte did something quite novel with their new G1.Sniper 5 motherboard and unlike most novel things in tech this one is quite useful. The short version is that on the G1.Sniper 5 has swappable op-amps.
The new G1.Sniper 5 is the latest high-end Haswell board with a Z87 chipset and it is packed with goodies. It has four PCIe 16x lanes via a PLX switch, full digital VRMs from IR, and solid caps. Gold plated power, DIMM, and back panel connectors are rolled in to the Ultra-Durable 5 Plus banner along with all the other goodies from past generations. Normally gold plating gets a sneer from us, but the pins in the power and a few other connectors are visibly more solid than others and the gold plating here is the one area that is actually worth it. This isn’t for show hence the lack of skepticism.
Some may argue that gold plating the audio connectors is worth it too but I am not one of those. That said those people are the target market for the G1.Sniper 5 board, and to them it tends to matter a lot. On the audio side there is a Creative Sound Blaster Gold 3D rig and the entire audio system is on a separate power plane. Better yet there is a full op-amp on board that is socketed.
Op-amp to the left of the watermark
Why would you socket it? How about to swap it out with the other one included in the system for a noticeably different sound. If two op-amp variants are not enough Gigabyte will sell you a kit with three more from Burr-Brown, Linear Technology, and Analog Devices along with a handy chip puller for those not willing to soil their fingers. In total there are five op-amp choices to choose from, and based on the demo at Gigabyte they do offer significantly different sound, and all are noticeably better than the non-op-amp sound output.
Three more op-amps for your fiddling pleasure
There are two versions of the G1.Sniper called 5 and M5, the M5 being a micro-ATX version vs the full-sized 5. The differences are obvious, a few less SATA ports, USB, and one less slot on the M5 or about what you would expect from a physically smaller PCB. For enthusiasts there is other difference, the heat sink on the chipset and VRMs.
The M5 has a big beefy chipset heatsink, the 5 has a bigger beefier chipset heatsink and a massive one on the VRMs. Not only that there is a fan and liquid cooling ports on the 5, both lacking on the M5. Most people don’t water cool or push the VRMs beyond their tolerances and those who do will not worry about space constrained cases either. Gigabyte made the right choice here.
One more interesting note is how they wired their USB, there are 10 USB3 ports on the G1.Sniper 5 board, a few less on the M5. Haswell doesn’t support that many ports so there is obviously a USB hub on the board. The first spin of Haswell has a minor bug in the USB3 implementation that can cause streams to fail on wakeup. It will be interesting to see if putting a hub in the middle changes this ‘feature’, anyone know for sure?
In the end, Gigabyte did something quite unique, they came up with a feature on PC motherboards that is new, different, and quite useful. In a fairly mature industry that tends to offer style, used loosely, over substance, the latter of those features tends to be missing from many new devices. Luckily Gigabyte did right and from what we have literally heard, it is a worthwhile addition.S|A
Have you signed up for our newsletter yet?
Did you know that you can access all our past subscription-only articles with a simple Student Membership for 100 USD per year? If you want in-depth analysis and exclusive exclusives, we don’t make the news, we just report it so there is no guarantee when exclusives are added to the Professional level but that’s where you’ll find the deep dive analysis.
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- What console will sell more than all the rest combined in 2014? - Apr 23, 2014
- Altera puts hard FP functions in Arria 10 and Stratix 10 - Apr 22, 2014
- Samsung lays down the design law to Apple - Apr 22, 2014
- What kind of numbers are Intel contra-revenue funding? - Apr 21, 2014
- SemiAccurate was right about Apple’s foundry plans - Apr 17, 2014