We told you that Apple was going to TSMC at 20nm last year, then went over a lot of the implications, specifically for Nvidia. The ripple effects also hit Samsung hard, both in technical and non-technical areas. The big players are all lined up for 20nm, and though some lesser players may yet play musical chairs, the largest consumers of wafers invariably set the agenda.
Apple moving from Samsung to TSMC is the lynchpin that most of the others make decisions around mainly because it changes the available options so radically. With 20nm decided, that brings up the question of what the company is doing at 14nm? What they say and do at this node will if not dictate what the others do, heavily influence what they can do. The one thing we can say for sure is that all the people claiming that Apple is doing this or that are wrong.
Note: The following is analysis for professional level subscribers only.
Disclosures: Charlie Demerjian and Stone Arch Networking Services, Inc. have no consulting relationships, investment relationships, or hold any investment positions with any of the companies mentioned in this report.
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- More on Intel’s 10nm process problems - Sep 17, 2018
- Intel puts out another 14nm 2020 server platform - Sep 11, 2018
- Why Can’t Intel Supply Enough 14nm Xeons? - Sep 10, 2018
- Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE directly recommends AMD Epyc - Sep 7, 2018
- AMD reintroduces the Athlon name with two CPUs - Sep 6, 2018