If this is true, it leaves Nvidia, AMD, and Intel, not to mention many specialty users, in quite a pickle. From Samsung’s point of view, it makes complete sense, low volumes, tight production tolerances, and few customers mean that even with decent margins, the net profit isn’t great.
With the GPU market imploding next year with Haswell and Kaveri, there doesn’t seem to be a future for GDDR5 that can be honestly tied to the word ‘volume’. For Samsung, a company about volume, this is a clear sign to bail out. And SemiAccurate moles say they are bailing.
We have not confirmed this with Samsung, but word has it that at least two of the three players listed above are already aware of the problem. If true, this could seriously shake up the GPU business, with volume buyers getting the first pick of scarce parts. We think Samsung will continue to make GDDR5, but not do the R&D necessary for any new spec. Keep an eye on this sector, it could get very ugly.S|A
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- More on Intel’s 10nm process problems - Sep 17, 2018
- Intel puts out another 14nm 2020 server platform - Sep 11, 2018
- Why Can’t Intel Supply Enough 14nm Xeons? - Sep 10, 2018
- Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE directly recommends AMD Epyc - Sep 7, 2018
- AMD reintroduces the Athlon name with two CPUs - Sep 6, 2018