For both of you that didn’t see this one coming, SURPRISE! For the other few million of you this is the obvious step forward for GPUs. GlobalFoundries’ push-button not-a-shrink 12nm replacement transistor does what it says, replaces the transistors for a claimed 15% boost in clock speeds and 12% performance boost. Other than that it is a standard RX580, the details look like this.
Radeon RX590 Specs
AMD is not shy about saying they are targeting the yawning gap in the market from between the 580/1060 and Vega56/1070 with this new part. With a $279 retail price it won’t tempt many current gen RX5xx owners, and the same goes for GeForce 9xx/10xx owners. That said AMD sweetens the deal with three games, Devil May Cry 5, The Division 2, and Resident Evil 2, all of which are equally tempting to the author. Yes that was sarcasm but as we always say, if you were looking at these games anyway, an RX590 might be a decent upgrade.
Four variants at launch
This new GPU is obviously at the high end of the mainstream market and will launch with four cards. All of them are part of their respective vendors’ overclocking/enthusiast lines with no mainstream/vanilla/reference rebadge parts out of the gate. If the picture doesn’t make it obvious you will have devices from Asus/Strix, Sapphire/Nitro, XFX/noniftyname, and Powercolor/Devil.
Overall it looks like the GlobalFoundries 12nm process is living up to it’s pushbutton claims. The originally promised 10% headroom that the not-quite-a-shrink buys is delivered upon and AMD has a new part in the meat of the market. It won’t change the balance of power but it will add a few options if you are interested in 1080p gaming. The only thing missing is the inevitable monitor and GPU bundles but they can’t be far off.S|A
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- Intel shows off 10nm 112Gbps SerDes - Mar 12, 2019
- Intel releases Compute Express Link spec - Mar 11, 2019
- Qualcomm rolls out a second gen 5G modem called X55 - Feb 19, 2019
- What is Intel’s Foveros tech and what isn’t it? - Feb 11, 2019
- Why SemiAccurate called 10nm wrong - Jan 25, 2019